Thursday 9 May 2013

Privacy: do we have it online?


Once I had a really big fight with my boyfriend when he logged in on my Facebook page and read three really big paragraphs I had written to a friend of mine about him. I can't remember properly but in that time I was really mad at him, and I yelled that he had not shown respect to my privacy and space. I got to think much later that, although he was, indeed, disrespectful and shouldn't have intruded on my personal life, I can't claim for privacy on a Facebook page. It simply has no sense at all.

Everything we type, everything we talk to each other on any social network is being stored somewhere. Of course, much of it is not being used, is virtual waste. Gigas and gigas of texts, images and files we trade with our friends everyday through these social networks. The major companies haven't found yet a use for it. They are just storing it, and as the new technologies just advance - in a way that virtual space doesn't seem to become a problem in the future - they just don't care. But the fact is that there is a LOT of data being stored, and the big companies have easy access to it.

So isn't it kinda worrying, that every little thing we type to each other is somewhere, in some hard disk, stored, just waiting to become useful? Yes it is. Imagine how misread can be all this data if, somehow, you become a suspect of a crime you haven't actually committed. Imagine if you said things to your doctor or your lawyer - things that should have the privilege to be maintained secret - and they hack and manage to get them? I know this scenery might sound a little too fantastic and unreal, but these are only to illustrate, in a overwhelming way, what could happen with all the things we store online and we call "private".

For now, they haven't yet found a way to use all this data. Most of it is being stored and it is slowly starting to worry main TI companies, not because of the virtual space, for I just said, there is enough of it, but because it might reach an amount that it becomes impossible to process it. They are, at this very moment, trying to find a way to process this data and to make it useful. Yes, all your texts and all your stuff you put online and you don't want all of the people to find out or see - all this stuff is actually being processed. They are trying to find patterns, to use it somehow, trying to turn it into marketable information. But they haven't yet. Although you may think that sites as Amazon.com and others are really intelligent cause they seem to know what products would you want to buy, they are not using "private" information to run this algorithms. They are using information based on what you searched online, what, I must warn you if you don't know already, is not private. Not a single word you search online is private.

But concerning the data and texts that all social networks assure you that it belongs to you and to you only, you should know that it is being processed. They are trying to find a way to use it, but they haven't yet. What will become of us when they do? That said, here's my advice: do not put your whole life on the internet. Whether you like it or not, it'll go global.

Culture of Fear and Consumption


I first heard the expression "Culture of Fear" when I was only 12. My mother had rented the movie "Bowling for Columbine" (Michael Moore, 2002) for she had to watch it as part of a coursework, so I joined her. This movie is a documentary that explores the causes of a massacre that took place in a High School in 1999. It not only talks about that, but it also discuss other acts of violence with guns. I remember a particular scene, in which Michael Moore (the actual designer of the whole film) interviews Marylin Manson and asks for his opinion on what could possibly have created this constant fear the Americans live with, and why is it plausible. Marylin stated that, although many blamed the violence in television, cinema and computer games to be the main causes of this "environment of fear and violence", those were not the real causes. He said that the United States' society is based on a "fear and consumption" culture, where people buy because of fear.

I was very interested on his view - which had a lot of other points to sustain it, I simply can't remember all of them - and then I started to dig out information on this called "Culture of Fear". I found out that, actually, the main definition for it is related to politics, in a way that some society incite fear in the public to achieve political goals.

"The people don't want war, but they can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and for exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country." -Hermann Göring.

This term was also used to describe irrational fear in other contexts, such as people fearing other people from different ethnical origins, and etc. None of those applied to what Manson wanted to say though.

The Culture of Fear present in the American society - and maybe we can actually broaden its concept to the whole world's society - has a different meaning. There is a Colgate commercial that promise "if you have bad breath, they are not going to talk to you". This may sound a simple commercial, but if we pay a little more attention to the sentence, we'll be able to observe that they are , in a certain way, inciting a fear in whoever watches it. The purpose of it is to make one feel afraid of the bad breath, and to buy their product because he is afraid of having a bad breath. There are a lot of other commercials containing fear-based messages.

But the question is: why incite fear? Because it is profitable. Media is always stating that we live in violent times, and showing murders, assaults, robbery statistics on TV and on the news all the time. Every newspaper, every headline that is made to scandal its readers: they are making a fear grow inside people. And this fear is extremely profitable. Of course, many may say that indeed we live in violent times... But humanity has always live in violent times. And, along with the fear, they also announce its solution: buying. So people go shopping, because they have fear. They build high electrical fences, they buy electronic devices, they improve their car security. In America, they even buy guns, and we all know that the guns market in the US is gigantic.

For comparison purpose, if you go to Canada, especially if you go to cities that are located near the border with US, you won't notice houses so damn secured. In fact, you will notice the opposite: Canadians leave their doors unlocked, they have low fences, they do not worry so badly with security. That would be really weird, since they are really near the US, therefore the danger is almost the same. 

Anyway, it is important to point out that the Culture of Fear and Consumption is not exclusively American. It exists in the whole world, because it's what make the capitalism gears spin, but in the US is more intense.

Tuesday 7 May 2013

Wikileaks reveals mass surveillance of mobile devices

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has warned, "You're all screwed," when it comes to smartphone and gadget monitoring and surveillance.

Why? Read more: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2129565/wikileaks-reveals-mass-surveillance-mobile-devices

Software that tracks people on social media created by defence firm

A multinational security firm has secretly developed software capable of tracking people's movements and predicting future behaviour by mining data from social networking websites.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/10/software-tracks-social-media-defence

What Your Cell Phone Could Be Telling the Government

Smart phones do many things these days: surf the Internet, send e-mail, take photos and video (and — oh, yes — send and receive calls). But one thing they can do that phone companies don't advertise is spy on you. As long as you don't leave home without your phone, that handy gadget keeps a record of everywhere you go — a record the government can then get from your telephone company.


Every email and website to be stored

It will allow security services and the police to spy on the activities of every Briton who uses a phone or the internet.

Moves to make every communications provider store details for at least a year will be unveiled later this year sparking fresh fears over a return of the surveillance state.


The plans were shelved by the Labour Government last December but the Home Office is now ready to revive them.


It comes despite the Coalition Agreement promised to "end the storage of internet and email records without good reason".


Any suggestion of a central "super database" has been ruled out but the plans are expected to involve service providers storing all users details for a set period of time.


Source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8075563/Every-email-and-website-to-be-stored.html

Smartphones To Collect Biometric Data

Perhaps even more startling than the government’s little-known Rapid DNA project, the U.S. Department of Defense begun a new project that will turn smartphones into devices that can collect biometric data.